The History of Cricket: 1746 - 1750 | The History of Cricket: 1761 - 1770 | Biographies | Essays

The History of Cricket: 1751 - 1760

1751 | 1752 | 1753 | 1754 | 1755 | 1756 | 1757 | 1758 | 1759 | 1760

Just as we think we are learning a lot more about the game in the 1740s, suddenly the number of reports reduce after 1752 and we are back to scraps of information as in the 1720s!

Having said that, the number of matches played in this period may have been affected by three factors, the most obvious of which is the deaths in 1750 and 1751 of the game's two most significant patrons: the Duke of Richmond and the Prince of Wales. But the prime factor must have been war which, as always, took its toll of the country's manpower and resources. The country was still recovering from the War of the Austrian Succession (1740 - 1748) and its satellite conflicts in India and North America. Peace, as always in such times of political instability, was transitory and the Seven Years War (1756 - 1763) soon followed. Some gentlemen players and patrons will have taken up commissions in the armed forces and of course many of the professional players will have joined the redcoated ranks or become not-so-jolly Jack Tars. The impact of these wars was surely the same as in the early 19th century when British forces took the field against Bonaparte and cricket was reduced to a handful of games per season.

Another impact during this period may have been cricket's first bowling revolution. It is generally believed that the pitched delivery was introduced before 1770 but we do not know when. When we remember the introductions of roundarm and overarm bowling, then pitching may have created similar controversy. Strangely, the sources are quiet about it but it is reasonable to assume that pitching was not allowed without argument.

We do not know when the Hambledon Club was founded or when the Hambledon team began its rise to greatness, presumably by first proving that it was the best in Hampshire, but it was certainly involved in major matches by 1756 when it played Dartford three times.

1751

the history

The population of Great Britain in 1751 reached 7,250,000 and, although the figure was rising, the country remained a small rural society with London the only real urban centre.

the cricket

Having lost the Duke of Richmond in 1750, cricket was hit by the death of another significant patron, the Prince of Wales, on 31 March. The loss of these patrons had an adverse impact on the game's finances and the number of top-class matches reduced for some years to come, although economic difficulties arising from the wars of the period certainly inhibited many potential investors. It was said that the Prince of Wales died as a result of being struck on the head by a cricket ball. He may well have been hit on the head but that did not kill him; the cause of death was a burst abscess in a lung.

The early death of Prince Frederick Louis meant that his son Prince George became heir to the throne and he succeeded in 1760 as George III.

The earliest known references to cricket in each of Durham, Somerset, Warwickshire and Yorkshire are all found in 1751.

The earliest reference to cricket in Somerset is a match on 13 July that was played in memory of the late Prince of Wales.

A match announcement in Aris' Gazette on 15 July is the earliest known reference to cricket in Warwickshire.

The earliest reference to cricket in Durham is a game at Raby Castle on or soon after Mon 5 August between the Earl of Northumberland's XI and the Duke of Cleveland's XI. The game was commemorated by a ballad, recorded in ASW, which starts:

Durham City has been dull so long,
No bustle at all to show;
But now the rage of all the throng
Is at cricketing to go.

The earliest definite reference to cricket in Yorkshire is a game soon after Mon 5 August at Stanwick, near Richmond, between Duke of Cleveland's XI and Earl of Northumberland's XI (the same teams that played in Durham, as noted above). Other writers have quoted "a local match in Sheffield" but according to evidence found by Steven Draper the 1751 reference to Sheffield appears to be spurious.

Surrey v London

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London

Mon 13 May 1751

result unknown (ASW)

The actual title of the match as advertised beforehand was Addington, Warlingham, Croydon & Cheam versus Ripley, Thursley & London! Wickets to be pitched at one o'clock and the game was arranged by the noblemen and gentlemen of the London Club. No match details were reported afterwards.

All-England v Kent

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London

Mon 20 & Tues 21 May 1751

All-England won by 9 runs (ASW/CS)

Kent had Tom Faulkner (Addington and Surrey) as a given man. All-England scored 26 and 122; Kent replied with 76 and 63. So 287 runs were scored in the match and this was a lot for the time, given the uncertain state of all wickets.

All-England: Stephens, Richard Newland, Edward Aburrow senior, John Harris, Joseph Harris, John Frame, Matthews, Perry, Stephen Harding, Stephen Dingate, A N Other.

Kent: William Hodsoll, Tom Faulkner, Stone, Wilden, Garrett, Rawlings, John & Thomas Bell, Howard, James Bryant, Val Romney.

We know that A N Other played for Thursley, as did Harding (later of Chertsey) who was a noted bowler. In England's second innings, these two went in first and scored 51 for the first wicket, which is like a double century partnership nowadays. Harding apparently made 50 of these himself and had one hit out of the ground and against a house on Bunhill Row opposite. He was given four for this mighty effort. You could only score six if you were actually able to run that many and to do that you would need the help of overthrows.

Play on the first day started at one o'clock and on the second day at ten o'clock. At the end of the first day, Kent in their second innings were 23-2, still needing 73 to win. Kent were reduced to 43-9 when the last pair came together so the final wicket added 20.

For the first time ever, we know the fall of wickets in an innings. This is England's second innings:

1 - 51, 2 - 72, 3 - 77, 4 - 77, 5 - 78, 6 - 84, 7 - 87, 8 - 119, 9 - 119, 10 - 122

All-England v Kent

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London

Wed 22 May 1751

All-England won by an innings & 9 runs (ASW/CS)

Kent scored 88 and 67; All-England scored 164. The teams were the same as on the two previous days and again the name of the Thursley player is unrecorded. It would seem that Kent was no longer good enough to challenge All-England.

All-England: Stephens, Richard Newland, Edward Aburrow senior, John Harris, Joseph Harris, John Frame, Matthews, Perry, Stephen Harding, Stephen Dingate, A N Other (of Thursley).

Kent: William Hodsoll, Tom Faulkner, Stone, Wilden, Garrett, Rawlings, John & Thomas Bell, Howard, James Bryant, Val Romney.

Addington v Hadlow

Hayes Common, near Bromley, Kent

Sat 1 June 1751

result unknown (GB18)

Pre-announced in the Daily Advertiser on Thursday 30 May.

Mon 3 June. A fives match was played in the Artillery Ground between Kent and Surrey. The Kent team was Tom Faulkner (given man), John & Thomas Bell, Stone and Val Romney. The Surrey team was Stephen Dingate, John Harris, Joseph Harris, Stephen Harding and Perry. Kent won although the betting was in favour of Surrey.

Wed 5 June. The same two teams met in a return match at the Artillery Ground with Kent winning by 14 runs. Kent scored 4 and 57; Surrey replied with 26 and 21. Kent made a huge improvement in their second innings!

Surrey v Middlesex

Kennington Common, Kennington, Surrey

Mon 24 June 1751

result unknown (GB18)

Announced in the Daily Advertiser same day with a one o'clock start.

ASW records four matches played at Newmarket and Woburn between Gentlemen of England and Eton College Past & Present. The four games were played during June and July. The second game has a surviving scorecard but the teams in all four matches are decidedly minor.

Dartford v Bromley

Dartford Brent, Dartford, Kent

Tues 23 July 1751

result unknown (ASW/CS)

This was played for one hundred guineas. Apparently, there was a challenge from the Newmarket players to take on 22 of the players in this game for any sum, but nothing further is known about it.

Bromley v Dartford

Bromley Common, Bromley, Kent

Thurs 1 August 1751

result unknown (GB18)

This was a return to the match on 23 July.

London v Country XI

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London

Mon 19 August 1751

London won by 5 runs (ASW/DC)

London scored 30 and 5; the Country XI replied with 24 and 6.

Richmond v Kingston & Hampton

Moulsey Hurst, near Molesey, Surrey

Wed 4 September 1751

result unknown (PVC)

Announced in the Daily Advertiser on Monday 2 September: for two guineas a man; 11 a side, and to play home & home (sic).

1752

the history

A very important year in dating terms. The Gregorian calendar, first devised in 1582, was finally adopted in Great Britain.

An 11-day discrepancy between the Julian and Gregorian versions was corrected by having Wednesday 2 September 1752 followed by Thursday 14 September 1752. There was civil unrest among the population due to a widespread belief that people's lives were literally being shortened by 11 days!

The British also adopted 1 January as the day when a new year begins, effective from 1 January 1753. The year had previously begun on 25 March. This meant that 1 February 1752 in a country like Holland, that had already adopted the Gregorian Calendar, was 1 February 1751 in England, where the Julian Calendar was still in use. Therefore, 24 March 1751 was followed by 25 March 1752.

1752 is Great Britain's shortest-ever year since it began on 25 March, ended on 31 December and also lost the 11 days in September.

In North America, Benjamin Franklin invented his lightning conductor.

the cricket

Fortunately, for the purposes of this work, the calendar has minimal impact because the cricket season never began before 25 March and so the year is always the same whether a Julian or Gregorian date is used, apart from a few out of season references that have been noted accordingly. The only problem is that care has to be taken re any original sources that insisted on using the Julian date after the Gregorian Calendar was introduced. Indeed, there is an example of this below re the Sussex Weekly Advertiser.

On Thursday 27 February (Julian), the Daily Advertiser reported that George Smith of the Artillery Ground had taken the late Duke of Somerset's house at Marlborough and intended to open it as an inn. Smith offered the Artillery Ground and its dwelling house, etc. on lease for 7 years. Smith had evidently overcome his bankruptcy problems in 1748.

On Saturday 30 May (Julian), the Daily Advertiser carried a notice re the Artillery Ground that gentlemen may be supplied with bats and balls and that the ground is kept in good order for play by your humble servant William Sharpe.

Kent v Surrey

Chislehurst Common, Chislehurst, Kent

Wed 17 June 1752

result unknown (GB18)

This match was advertised on Tues 16 June in the Daily Advertiser by George Williams of the White Lion at Streatham who said he would provide the best of liquors and a cold collation; he humbly hoped the noblemen and gentlemen would do him the honour of regaling themselves!

See the games on 3 and 21 August 1745 for earlier references to Mr Williams and his catering services. Williams played cricket himself and was captain of the Streatham club in 1745.

Bromley v London

Bromley Common, Bromley, Kent

Tues 30 June 1752

match drawn (GB18)

London scored 52 and 92; Bromley replied with 60 and were 52 for 5 when play ended, presumably because of rain.

The precise venue was the White Hart field on Bromley Common. Stakes were £50 a side.

Bromley had J Mansfield (Sevenoaks) and Howard (Kent) as given men.

London v Bromley

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London

Wed 15 July 1752

result unknown (GB18)

This was the return match postponed from Monday 6 July due to wet weather.

Westminster v Addington

Tothill Fields, Westminster, Middlesex

Mon 20 July 1752

result unknown (GB18)

Westminster's team included Stephen Dingate, William Anderson, the two Bennetts, Perry and Capon. The Addington team included J Mansfield, George Jackson, John Frame, Durling and the Harrises.

Dartford v The Rest

Dartford Brent, Dartford, Kent

Wed 29 July 1752

result unknown (GB18)

Dartford's team was pre-announced as William Hodsoll, John Bryant, Robert Eures and 8 others of the parish of Dartford against any 11 men to be chosen and taken in any part of England. Dartford was a very strong team in the 1750s and this match is reminiscent of the Slindon challenges of a decade earlier.

London v Edmonton

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London

Wed 29 July 1752

result unknown (GB18)

The prize was 10 guineas.

Westminster v Addington

Tothill Fields, Westminster, Middlesex

Mon 3 August 1752

Westminster by 10 runs (GB18)

This may be a return to the match on Mon 20 July or it may be the same match having been postponed.

Dartford v The Rest

Dartford Brent, Dartford, Kent

Tues 11 August 1752

result unknown (GB18)

Dartford with 4 men allowed against 11 men to be picked out of All England, for £20 a side.

Addington v Dartford

Addington Hill, near Croydon, Surrey

Wed 12 August 1752

result unknown (GB18)

This was another match announced by our most humble servant George Williams, who would again provide the usual accommodation and victuals.

The Daily Advertiser on Mon 31 August (two days before the end of the Julian Calendar) announced a game on the same day between Marybone (sic) Club and 11 of London for a guinea a man: to meet at Francis Ludgate's, the Sun and Sportsman next the church. Wickets to be pitched at one o'clock, and the match played out. Note that this Marylebone Club had no connection with the MCC. (GB18)

On the same day, there was a match at Durdham Down near Bristol between 11 of Bristol and 11 of London for 20 guineas. This was announced in Felix Farley's Bristol Journal on Sat 29 August (Julian). (GB18)

Deptford v Westminster

Upper Fountain, Deptford, Kent

Thur 28 September 1752

result unknown (GB18)

The Daily Advertiser on Sat 29 August (Julian) announced that this game would take place on Thurs 14 September (i.e., day one itself of the Gregorian Calendar immediately following the last Julian date of Wed 2 Sept). Tom Faulkner and one of the Harrises were to be given men on the Deptford side. On Thurs 21 September (Gregorian), the Daily Advertiser announced postponement of the match to Thurs 28 September and reported that John Bryant and two from Chislehurst would play for Deptford instead of Faulkner and Harris who were not allowed to play.

Sussex v Surrey

Long Down, somewhere in Sussex?

Fri 29 September 1752

Surrey won by c.80 runs (TJM)

An interesting one in calendar terms as the report was in the Sussex Weekly Advertiser dated Thurs 16 October (Julian date), which should officially have been dated Thurs 5 October (Gregorian). The report says: Last Friday se'enight the great Match at Cricket between Surrey and Sussex was finished, on Long Down, when Surrey beat by about four score Notches. The match took place on Fri 29 September (Gregorian), not Fri 10 October (Julian) as the source infers.

1753

the history

5 April. The founding charter of the British Museum was enacted.

the cricket

A poem, dedicated to the 1st Duke of Dorset, refers to a crimson cricket ball (see Barty-King). It may have been made by Mr Clout, whose firm was in Sevenoaks where the Dukes of Dorset reside at Knole House.

Dover v Dartford

Dover, Kent

Mon 6 & Tues 7 August 1753

Dover won by 7 runs (GB18/CS)

Dover scored 57 and 83; Dartford scored 95 and 38.

This is the first significant mention of Dover in cricket history. Dartford remained a premier club through the 1750s so presumably this was a shock result.

Two Elevens

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London

Wed 15 August 1753

result unknown (GB18)

This was a benefit match for Mr Anderson of the Dial in Long Alley, Moorfields. There was a well-known player called William Anderson, first mentioned in 1745, so presumably this was he. The two elevens were made up of various players from the general London area with the best bowlers to be parted.

London v Marylebone

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London

Thurs 30 August 1753

result unknown (GB18)

Marylebone (no connection with MCC) had Tall Bennett and King as given men.

Mon 10 September. Two of London were to play Tom Faulkner and Joe Harris for £20 at the Artillery Ground (GB18).

1754

the history

6 March. Death in office of Henry Pelham, the prime minister. He was succeeded by his brother, the Duke of Richmond's old friend Thomas Pelham-Holles, 1st Duke of Newcastle (1693 - 1768; Whig), his first term of office ending in October 1756.

the cricket

The Leeds Intelligencer, forerunner of the Yorkshire Post, began publication. It has always been a noted source for cricket in Yorkshire.

Fri 21 & Sat 22 June. TJM records Midhurst & Petworth v Slindon on Bowling Green, Lavington Common. The former apparently won by eight wickets and the match seems to mark the swansong of Slindon as a great team as they are not mentioned in the sources thereafter. Sussex cricket as a whole went into decline and, although a number of inter-parish games are reported over the next decade or so, it is not until 1766 that we again find a Sussex team in a major match. This temporary demise of Sussex is surely explained by the death of the Duke of Richmond in 1750. He was the greatest patron of Sussex cricket, and of Slindon in particular. His co-patron and good friend Sir William Gage died in 1744.

The Daily Advertiser on Friday 28 June announced for the same day a two-a-side game behind George Taylor's at Deptford. The players were Tom Faulkner and Joseph Harris v Capon and Perry. (PVC)

London v Dartford

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London

Mon 1 July 1754

Dartford won by 3 wickets (PVC/CS)

London made 78 and 50; Dartford replied with 55 and 74-7.

The Daily Advertiser on Fri 28 June said: Wickets pitched at Twelve, and to begin play at One. A curious arrangement!

Surrey v Sussex

Guildford, Surrey

Mon 22 July 1754

result unknown (GB18)

The match was advertised as: Guildford, Ripley, Thursley and the lower part of Surrey against Bolney, Brighton and the eastern part of Sussex. The stake was 20 guineas a side.

Both the above two games were mentioned in the same report by Read's Weekly Journal dated Sat 31 August: Dartford won away & lost at home against Woolwich on Sat. & Mon., Aug. 24 & 26 respectively.

Tues 24 September. CS records a single wicket game at Brompton in Kent between the well-known Thomas Brandon of Dartford and Parr of Chatham. The stakes were five guineas each and Brandon won by 47 runs.

1755

the history

Samuel Johnson, who provided us with the first mention of cricket at Oxford University in 1729, published his famous Dictionary in 1755.

There was a massive earthquake in Lisbon which killed an estimated 30,000 people.

the cricket

Cricket at Cambridge University was first mentioned in 1710. These are the first matches we know of that were played by a team representing the University. It is not clear if the Eton team was past or present pupils or both. From a comment made by the Public Advertiser, it would seem that the teams met in 1754 also and that Eton won.

The Daily Advertiser announced on Thurs 12 June that on Monday next, 16 June, the Duke of Cumberland (aka the Butcher) would review Lt Gen. Cholmondeley's Regiment of Dragoons upon Datchet Common, Bucks. After the review a cricket match was to be played for a considerable sum of money. (PVC)

Thurs 26 June. DC records a fives match on Kennington Common in which the London Club defeated Windsor & Eton by 8 runs. London scored 13 and 22; Windsor & Eton scored 11 and 16. London's team was Perry, the two Bennetts, Capon and Clowder.

Hampton v Kingston

Hampton Court Green, Hampton, Middlesex

Thurs 10 July 1755

Hampton won by 3 wickets (DC)

Kingston scored 95 and 50; Hampton scored 72 and 65-7. Play was delayed for an hour by rain after Hampton's first innings ended. Odds were a guinea to a crown on the Kingston side and at last as much on the Court side!

London v Waltham

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London

Mon 21 July 1755

result unknown (GB18)

The game was pre-announced by the Daily Advertiser on Sat 19 July.

Mon 28 July. Joe Harris and another London player against two Surrey players at the Artillery Ground. Result unknown.

London v Surrey & Middlesex

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London

Fri 8 August 1755

London won by 20 runs (DC)

The match was described as so long depending which suggests it may have been postponed. Only the result and venue are known. We know that Tom Faulkner, Joe Harris and John Frame all played for London as given men.

Thurs 28 August. Mr Waghorn recorded an horrific injury to a player who had his right eye knocked out by a ball. The game was on Kennington Common but no other information was reported.

1756

the history

The beginning of the calamitous Seven Years War against Louis XV of France to 1763. Great Britain and Prussia were allied against France and Austria as a result of ongoing conflicts in North America and in Silesia. A subsidiary conflict called the Third Carnatic War developed in India. Great Britain suffered some early setbacks and, in October, the Newcastle ministry was obliged to resign.

One of the setbacks, which caused national outrage in Britain, was the infamous Black Hole of Calcutta, which occurred when Siraj-ud-Daulah, Nawab of Bengal, captured Calcutta and imprisoned 146 British in a small room where most died in one night.

In November, William Cavendish, 4th Duke of Devonshire (1720 - 1764; Whig) became prime minister to May 1757. He was effectively an interim prime minister because of the refusal by William Pitt (the Elder) to serve in Newcastle's cabinet and the subsequent refusal of leading Whigs to accept Pitt as Newcastle's successor. However, Pitt was Secretary of State with responsibility for managing the war effort and held the real power in Devonshire's administration.

the cricket

There is no doubt that the Seven Years War had a severe impact on cricket. There is clearly a reduction in the number of major matches during its span, including none whatsoever in 1760, the middle year of the war. Many players must have joined the forces and the patrons will have been reluctant to invest in games fielding weak teams; in any case, they would need to save their money in wartime.

In many ways, the Seven Years War had a more profound impact on cricket than even the Napoleonic War, during which the game managed to stay on its feet due to the efforts of MCC and the Brighton club. But in the 1750s and 1760s, the sport relied on ad hoc patronage and there was no controlling body that could manage a co-ordinated response to the emergency. As a result, the sport had to fall back on its parish roots.

It is also very likely that cricket's first bowling revolution occurred in the next ten years or so as bowlers were certainly pitching the ball by 1770, but there are no surviving reports to describe the reception that pitching had when it was tried and implemented.

These three Dartford v Hambledon games are the earliest definite references to matches involving a Hambledon team. The one on Broadhalfpenny is known about because of the famous advert in the Reading Mercury concerning a dog called Rover whose owner lost him at the match. He was offering five shillings for Rover's return but we don't know if the poor dog was ever found again. It should be said that the advert does not conclusively prove that Hambledon was playing Dartford that day, but in the light of subsequent reports it seems a more than reasonable assumption.

We know nothing of the first match except that the last of the three on Monday 30 August was billed as the deciding match between the two elevens and played for £50 a side. Furthermore, in the Public Advertiser announcement which Mr Waghorn recorded re the game below on Mon 6 September, Dartford is said to have beat Hampshire (sic) 3 matches successively.

Ashley Mote in GDC has not recognised the first match. He lists only the games on Broadhalfpenny and the Artillery Ground but there seems little doubt from the evidence that three matches did take place.

Although the third match at the Artillery Ground may have been designated the deciding match, it was not literally so and would have been a decider only if honours had been even after the first two. The primary source clearly states that Dartford won three matches successively.

We have no definite knowledge of Hambledon cricket before 1756 but the team must have gained repute already to be capable of attempting three matches against Dartford, which had been a famous club since the 1720s if not earlier. Hambledon had presumably earned recognition as the best parish team in Hampshire, but no reports of their local matches have been found. We do not know when the Hambledon Club was founded and it seems likely that some kind of parish organisation was operating in 1756, although there may well have been a patron involved.

In DC, Mr Waghorn records a pre-announcement that a fives game involving a Hambledon side would be played on Sat 28 August at the Artillery Ground. The Hambledon players are unnamed but their opponents were a strong team: Tom Faulkner, Joe Harris, John Frame, John Bell and Durling. No details of the result were recorded. Stakes were £20 a side. This may have been a curtain raiser for the main event on Monday 30 August.

London v Dartford

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London

Mon 6 September 1756

result unknown (DC)

Played for £50 a side. London had John Bryant, Joe Harris, Durling and George Smith playing for them.

Dartford v London

Dartford Brent, Dartford, Kent

Thurs 9 September 1756

result unknown (DC)

In the announcement for the game on Mon 6 Sept, it says the second match will be played on Dartford Brim (sic) by the same gentlemen.

team names

Now that we have found some matches involving a team that might or might not have been raised by a Hambledon club or by a Hampshire club or by a Hambledon parish organisation or by a certain patron and given that this team might have been contemporarily labelled as Hambledon or Hampshire or Squire Land's XI or whoever. In some quarters, arguments about team names seem to be more important than discussing what the teams achieved. I am not going to get involved in this except to invoke the doctrine of Sir Neville Cardus again: The game and its players have always reflected their times.

The fact is that the contemporaries applied all sorts of labels to the teams they formed, played for, gambled upon, watched, talked about and wrote about.

In theory, you could have the same XI playing six successive matches against similar opponents and they could successively (and concurrently!) be named Hambledon Parish, Hampshire County, Earl of Winchilsea's XI, All-England, Hambledon Town, Duke of Dorset's XI; or even the Napoleon Bonaparte XI for all I know! And all (except one) of those names would be correct, or at least not incorrect. The contemporaries, the people who were around at the time, did not give a damn what the team's name was. So why should we?

Now obviously, for the purposes of a work like this, some kind of name has to be used in the match summaries and it is best to be as consistent as possible. I have taken what I hope is a common sense approach to the matter. If the main source, or what seems to be a majority of sources, has used Hambledon, then I have used Hambledon too. This is especially so if there is evidence that the team was limited to parishioners only as did happen in the 1770s when Small and Brett were excluded from a Hambledon team on the grounds that they lived in other parishes (i.e., Petersfield and Catherington respectively). If the consensus among my sources seems to be that Someone's XI was the preferred name, then I have used that.

But if it seems that there is no consensus as such and there is no special condition re a particular team's formation and it does seem to represent a certain county, notwithstanding a few given men, then I have tended to use the name of the county. I have done that through personal preference because the county, rather than the town or parish, is the team unit that I have always been used to. By and large, I have tried to adopt the same approach re the similar Chertsey/Surrey, Oldfield/Berkshire and Hornchurch/Essex options. But not with MCC, which is a special case, although its Thursday Club was the Middlesex county XI (but that is out of scope).

I do not insist that teams raised by the Hambledon Club were Hampshire and nothing but Hampshire. Indeed, there is a possibility that Hambledon was a two-counties organisation for its teams may have been representative of Sussex as well as Hampshire, as per 1772 sources. Several Hambledon players like Edward "Curry" Aburrow, Bayton, Noah Mann, William Barber, Richard Francis, Billy Beldham, John Wells and the Walkers came from other counties and Hampshire frequently used given men like John Edmeads, Lumpy, Lamborn and William Yalden. Even Richard Nyren was born in Sussex.

I think the whole issue of 18th century team names is a storm in a teacup and it is up to each writer to follow his own preferences.

That is the last I will say on this topic unless there is a case like the Thursday Club which does need some discussion because of the peculiar difficulties in understanding exactly what it represented; or unless I simply need to point out that the Hornchurch Club, for example, was representative of Essex as a county.

1757

the history

The Seven Years War escalated when Russia joined the Franco-Austrian alliance but there were significant victories for Prussia at the battles of Rossbach and Leuthen, where French and Austrian armies were defeated.

In May, following a reconciliation between Pitt and Newcastle, Devonshire felt obliged to resign as prime minister and Newcastle formed his second administration to May 1762. Pitt continued to direct the war effort as Secretary of State.

In India, the key battle of Plassey resulted in victory for Robert Clive (1725 - 1774) over the Nawab of Bengal and established the East India Company as the dominant power in most of India. Calcutta was restored to British rule and Britain captured the French possession of Chandernagore in Bengal.

the cricket

The following reference, found by Steve Harrison, is contained in William White's History & General Directory of the Borough of Sheffield (1833). In his introductory history, Mr White says: In 1757 we find the Town Trustees attempting the abolition of brutal sports by paying 14s6d to the cricket players on Shrove Tuesday 'to entertain the populace and prevent the infamous practice of throwing at cocks'. He does not give the primary source from which he himself derived the information but it would likely be in parish or town records of some kind which may or may not still exist.

There is a reference to the same in DC where Mr Waghorn quotes his source as the much later Records of the Burgery of Sheffield (1897) by Jno. D Leader (p.382) which dates the contract as 6 February 1757 (which may have been a Julian date as 6 February 1757 in the Gregorian Calendar was a Sunday).

London v Surrey

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London

Mon 25 & Tues 26 July 1757

Surrey won by 50 runs (CS/PVC)

There would seem to have been a declaration here. Surrey batted first and scored 84 to which London replied with 89. Surrey batted until close of play when they were apparently 126-4. It seems that London batted when play restarted on Tuesday morning and scored 71. CS says: so that Surrey beat London by 50 notches and had six wickets to knock down.

There are conflicting reports because PVC quotes the London Chronicle on Tues 26 July reporting the close of play score on Monday as (Surrey) had three hands put out but had got 117 notches ahead. That would make the close of play score 122-3 so it seems they received a slightly premature report; perhaps their newshound missed the final over!? Mr Buckley confirms this position in his other work GB18.

Chertsey v Hampton

Moulsey Hurst, near Molesey, Surrey

Fri 26 August 1757

Chertsey won (GB18)

Reported in the General Evening Post next day.

A match in September between Wirksworth and Sheffield at Brampton Moor, near Chesterfield, is the earliest reference to cricket in Derbyshire. Although we know of cricket being played in Sheffield since 1751, this may be the earliest indication of the Sheffield club that eventually became Yorkshire CCC.

1758

the history

The main event in the Seven Years War was the battle of Zorndorf, in which the Russians were defeated by the Prussians. The conflict was now moving in favour of the British-Prussian alliance.

the cricket

GB18 records a number of parish games this year: e.g., Saffron Walden v Cambridge; Faversham v Tenterden; Faversham v Dover; New Romney v Ashford. The presence of these and the absence of great matches indicates the lack of investment and resource in the game during wartime with the sport falling back onto its parish roots.

Only one great match has been found:

London & Surrey v Kent

Artillery Ground, Bunhill Fields, Finsbury, London?

Wed 16 & Thu 17 August 1758

L&S won (GB18)

The venue is uncertain and it is possible a return game took place at any of about five venues but the report in the General Evening Post (three weeks later) is very ambiguous.

CS records a fives game on Kennington Common in August. Tom Faulkner, one of the Harrises and three more of the London Club defeated five players from various Surrey clubs by three wickets.

1759

the history

Capture of Quebec by British forces. Both generals, James Wolfe of Great Britain and the Marquis de Montcalm of France, were killed in action.

the cricket

Mr Buckley recorded more parish games in Kent but the year is notable for the tri-series between Dartford and All-England.

Dartford v All-England

Dartford Brent, Dartford, Kent

Wed 5 & Thurs 6 September 1759

Dartford won (GB18/SB2)

Dartford had two given men: Tom Faulkner and Gascoigne of London.

All-England v Dartford

Dartford Brent, Dartford, Kent

Thurs 6 (& Fri 7) September 1759

All-England won (GB18)

This one was arranged immediately after the previous game finished at noon on Thursday. We do not actually know when this game finished so it is only an assumption that they played into Friday.

All-England v Dartford

Laleham Burway Ground, Chertsey, Surrey

Wed 12 September 1759

Dartford won by 3 wickets (GB18/SB2)

GB18 records that the deciding match was scheduled for Wed 12 September from an announcement in the Whitehall Evening Post dated Tues 11 September.

Mr Haygarth refers to this series on page 2 of S&B, but only to the two games won by Dartford. He appears to believe that only two games were played. He found the names of the players in both those matches in Bell's Life dated 23 November 1845, but no scores.Bell's Life stated that the matches took place in 1765 and Mr Haygarth says another account has 1762, but it is evident that Mr Buckley has got the dates (and the sequence) right as above.

Dartford's team, evidently unchanged in all three games, was:

Tom Faulkner, Gascoigne (both London, given men), John Frame, John Bell (wk), Potter (long stop), Thomas Brandon, Thomas Bell, Goldstone, Killick, Stevens (possibly Lumpy), Wakelin.

The All-England team, also apparently unchanged, was:

Burchwood (Kent), John Edmeads (Surrey), Gill (Bucks, wk), Wood (Surrey, long stop), Stephen Harding (Surrey), John Haynes (Surrey), Durling (Kent), Saunders (Berkshire), Allen (Middlesex), Nyland (sic, Sussex), Cheeseman (Sussex).

The main bowlers were stated to be Faulkner and Frame for Dartford; and Burchwood and Edmeads for All-England.

The most intriguing names are Nyland, who could have been any of the Newland brothers or perhaps their famous nephew Richard Nyren; and Stevens, who may have been the great Lumpy himself, no less. Richard Nyren and Lumpy were both 24 in 1759.

John Frame, who began in the 1740s, played on into the 1770s. He was the greatest bowler in England before Lumpy, Brett and Harris came along. John Edmeads, assuming it is the same man, was still playing for Chertsey and Surrey in the 1770s. Gill of Bucks is probably the wicket keeper in the score-recorded Hampshire v England match of June 1772.

Wood the long stop is probably the frustrating Surrey player of the 1770s whose name has caused so much confusion given his namesake from Kent and the differing accounts in which he is either John or Thomas!

1760

the history

25 October. Death of George II (1683 - 1760), King of Great Britain and Elector of Hanover since 1727. He was succeeded by his grandson George III (1738 - 1820), who was opposed to Whig policy and sought increasing political influence for himself.

the cricket

The barren season. No games of importance have been discovered. Messrs Buckley and McCann recorded a number of minor matches and additional news items, some in a military context and one in a naval context, which is a sign of the times re the drain of manpower and economic resource to the Seven Years War.

Richard Duke, the well known ball-maker of Penshurst in Kent, founded Duke & Son.

In the Leeds Intelligencer dated 20 May 1760: "Leedes (sic). The Gentlemen Cricket Players are desired to meet at Mr Cowling's at Chapeltown on Monday next the 26th instant at ten o'clock in the morning; at which place, all who are willing to become subscribers, are desired to attend. Dinner will be on the table at two o'clock." I am indebted to Steven Draper for this extract, which clearly shows that a Leeds club was founded in 1760.

It was about this time that cricket's first bowling revolution took place with the introduction of the pitched delivery which gave rise to the invention of the straight bat.